hermes cf08b751e4 feat(advice): use mistral-large-4, and cope with models that show their working
The model is now `mistral-large-4:cloud`, on the same Ollama instance.
It was probed before being made the default - `deepseek-v4-flash:cloud`,
`deepseek-v3.2:cloud` and `qwen3.5:cloud` are all retired and fail at
call time while still appearing in the model list.

What the probes showed
----------------------
`think: false` does NOT stop the reasoning.  It only changes where the
working goes: with thinking off, the model writes it into the CONTENT
instead of a separate field.  Either way the reasoning comes out of the
same token allowance as the answer, and at 500-3000 tokens the reply
came back EMPTY - which looks like a broken model rather than a budget
problem.  The budget is now 8000, and the timeout 120s.

The reply is also stripped of a reasoning preamble.  The advice is the
prose at the END; the working comes first, in several paragraphs.  The
preamble is found by walking back from the end of the reply and keeping
the paragraphs that read like advice to the brewer, rather than like
the model thinking out loud.

Verified against the live model, on a stalled brew (OG 1.042, 1.022 after
nine days, "no change since day 7"):

    That 1.022 reading after nine days at 19C - with no movement since
    day seven - looks like a stalled fermentation; a 1.042 wort should
    be well on its way to 1.010-1.012 by now, not sitting at only about
    48% attenuation. Gently swirl the fermenter to rouse the yeast cake
    and keep the temperature steady at 19-20C, and if the gravity hasn't
    budged in another 48 hours, pitch a fresh, healthy yeast starter...

And on a CORRECTED older reading - the case the review found broken -
the advice is about the corrected reading, with the later one as context:

    A brew-day reading of 1.038 against an OG of 1.042 is only four points
    low, which is almost certainly just the normal difference between
    your kettle gravity and the post-transfer fermenter reading...

169 tests (up from 167).
2026-11-09 17:10:24 +10:00
2024-09-07 23:24:32 +10:00
2024-09-07 23:24:32 +10:00
2024-09-07 23:24:32 +10:00
2024-09-07 23:24:32 +10:00
2024-09-07 23:24:32 +10:00

Brew Log

Stores specific-gravity data for home-brewed beer runs in Mongo and turns it into useful figures — alcohol by volume, days in the fermenter, gravity trends.

Flask app, Mongo backend, no build step for the front end.

Running it locally

python -m venv .venv
. .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements-dev.txt

export MONGO_HOST=192.168.178.229
export MONGO_USER=root
export MONGO_PASS=...
export SECRET_KEY=anything-for-local-use

cd src/flask
python -m beer_data            # dev server on :5000
# or, production-style:
python -m waitress --listen=0.0.0.0:5000 --call beer_data:create_app

Then open http://localhost:5000/ and sign in.

Tests

. .venv/bin/activate
python -m pytest tests/ -q

The tests use mongomock, so they need no database and no network.

The pages

Page What it is for
/login Sign in
/brews The brew process: record a reading, review every run
/active What is in the fermenter right now — tap, gravity, projected strength
/history How every brew has gone, with charts and the standard-vs-legacy ABV comparison
/analysis How consistently the brews ferment — attenuation, fermentation curves, brew timings

/active — the active beers page

A card per brew that is still in the fermenter (a run with no reading marked final), showing:

  • the tap number it is on,
  • the current gravity, as a decimal reading with the point scale beneath,
  • the projected alcohol, worked out from the run's original gravity,
  • how many days it has been brewing,
  • a sparkline of the gravity so far,
  • the latest comment on a reading.

A run with only one reading and no recorded original gravity has no reliable estimate, so the alcohol figure shows a dash rather than a misleading number. Record the OG on the run (or take a second reading) and it appears.

/analysis — how the brews ferment

The page that turns the history into something you can brew better from:

  • Attenuation by brew — what fraction of the original gravity was fermented away, for every finished brew.
  • Fermentation curves — the typical shape of a fermentation, drawn as a median curve with the min–max envelope behind it. Plotting every brew individually gives sixteen near-identical lines and an unreadable legend.
  • Every finished brew — OG, FG, ABV, attenuation, days in the fermenter, days to reach 1.010, and the finish date.
  • Readings that need a second look — readings outside the plausible hydrometer range.
  • Headline figures: average attenuation and its spread, average brew time, average time to 1.010.

A reading that is physically impossible — a final gravity below the original gravity by more than the wort itself could have — is excluded from the averages rather than silently distorting them, and the run is listed on the page so it can be corrected.

Run metadata

Some details cannot be derived from the readings, so they are stored per run in the beer_runs collection and edited on the run detail page:

  • the canonical name the brew is known by (overriding the drifting per-reading name),
  • the tap number,
  • the original gravity,
  • free-text brew notes.

Populating the run metadata from the existing readings

# dry run - prints what it would do, writes nothing
python scripts/backfill_run_metadata.py

# write it
python scripts/backfill_run_metadata.py --apply

The script is idempotent and non-destructive: it only inserts into beer_runs, never touches beer_data, and never overwrites a name you have already set by hand (pass --force if you want it to).

Layout

src/flask/
  beer_data.py       entry point; exposes `app` and `create_app`
  app_factory.py     application factory, request-scoped Mongo repository
  brewing.py         pure domain logic — gravity parsing, ABV, run aggregation
  views/             blueprints: auth, brews, analysis
  mongo/repository.py Mongo access for the beer_data and beer_runs collections
  templates/         Jinja templates
  static/            CSS, JS, fonts, logo (all served locally - no CDN)
tests/               pytest suite
scripts/             operational scripts (the run-metadata backfill)

brewing.py holds every piece of arithmetic and has no Flask or Mongo dependency, so the maths is unit-testable on its own.

Data model

beer_data — one document per gravity reading

Field Type Notes
_id string 24 random characters
beer_run_id string The run this reading belongs to, e.g. "20"
beer_type string Beer/cider name. Free text, per reading — it drifts across a run
sg string Specific gravity in points: 1039 means 1.039
date string YYYY-MM-DD
final_reading string "True" / "False" — marks the last reading of a run
comment string Free text

The unique key is (date, beer_run_id): re-submitting a reading for the same run and day updates it in place rather than creating a duplicate.

A run is active while it has no reading with final_reading == "True".

beer_runs — one document per run (metadata)

Added alongside the readings to hold what cannot be derived from them: the canonical beer name, the tap number, the recorded original gravity, and brew notes. This collection is only ever inserted into, never written over by the backfill.

Alcohol by volume

Standard homebrew formula:

ABV% = (OG - FG) × 131.25

With gravity stored in points, the drop is already in points, so ABV% = points_drop × 0.13125.

The previous version of this app used (max - min) / 7.36 + 0.5, which is not a recognised brewing formula and overstated every result. The old figure is still computed by brewing.legacy_abv_percent() so the history page can show the difference between the two.

For a run still in the fermenter the figure is an estimate: it uses the run's first reading as the original gravity. A run with a single reading and no recorded OG has no reliable estimate, and the UI shows a dash rather than a misleading number.

Deployment

The image is built and pushed by .gitea/workflows/build_push.yml on push to master. See RUNBOOK.md for the cluster side.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme
1.2 MiB
Languages
Python 64.3%
HTML 14.5%
JavaScript 11.4%
CSS 9%
Dockerfile 0.7%