2.7 KiB
Units Generation — Questions
Fill in each
[Answer]:tag. Options A-E plus X (Other). The file is the authoritative record of your unit-decomposition decisions.
Q1: Unit boundary strategy
How should the build units be drawn from the three components (Generator, AiDraft, Funnies)?
A) One unit per component: generator, ai-draft, funnies — each is a separately buildable piece (recommended; clean mapping to Domain Design)
B) One single unit containing all three components (coarse — simplest, one deliverable)
C) Split finer: e.g. layout, render, content-loader, puzzle-gen, cartoon sub-units
X) Other (please specify)
Q2: Unit granularity
How fine-grained should the units be at build time?
A) Coarse — a handful of units corresponding to the components (3 units) (recommended for a small local tool) B) Fine-grained — split each component into smaller buildable pieces for maximum reuse/testing granularity X) Other (please specify)
Q3: Integration points / contracts
How should the units share data and integrate (the contracts between them)?
A) A shared internal interface/module boundary per component (Generator calls AiDraft and Funnies via defined entry points; the DraftBundle JSON is the review handoff contract) (recommended) B) Loose — units communicate only through files on disk, no shared code interface C) A package-manager-style library dependency (one unit imports another as a package) X) Other (please specify)
Q4: Deployment model
For this fully-local tool, what deployment shape should the units take?
A) Embedded/static — one newspaper command + templates, all bundled; single local deliverable (recommended, matches CLI-first file-only posture)
B) Split executables that each run independently (no benefit here, but if preferred)
C) Library + thin CLI wrapper (the generator logic as a reusable library, plus a thin newspaper script)
X) Other (please specify)
Consolidated Summary Confirmation
Summary of your four decomposition answers before the unit artifacts are generated:
- Boundary strategy: one unit per component —
generator,ai-draft,funnies(Q1=A)- Granularity: coarse — 3 units corresponding to the components (Q2=A)
- Integration/contracts: defined internal interface boundaries; the DraftBundle JSON is the review handoff contract (Q3=A)
- Deployment: embedded/static — one
newspapercommand + templates, single local deliverable (Q4=A)Plan approval: the human pre-approved the decomposition plan (answers recorded via the file, self-guided mode).
Does this all look correct before I generate the unit artifacts?
- Looks correct
- Request changes
Answer: Looks correct