Units Generation — Questions

Fill in each [Answer]: tag. Options A-E plus X (Other). The file is the authoritative record of your unit-decomposition decisions.

Q1: Unit boundary strategy

How should the build units be drawn from the three components (Generator, AiDraft, Funnies)?

A) One unit per component: generator, ai-draft, funnies — each is a separately buildable piece (recommended; clean mapping to Domain Design) B) One single unit containing all three components (coarse — simplest, one deliverable) C) Split finer: e.g. layout, render, content-loader, puzzle-gen, cartoon sub-units X) Other (please specify)

Q2: Unit granularity

How fine-grained should the units be at build time?

A) Coarse — a handful of units corresponding to the components (3 units) (recommended for a small local tool) B) Fine-grained — split each component into smaller buildable pieces for maximum reuse/testing granularity X) Other (please specify)

Q3: Integration points / contracts

How should the units share data and integrate (the contracts between them)?

A) A shared internal interface/module boundary per component (Generator calls AiDraft and Funnies via defined entry points; the DraftBundle JSON is the review handoff contract) (recommended) B) Loose — units communicate only through files on disk, no shared code interface C) A package-manager-style library dependency (one unit imports another as a package) X) Other (please specify)

Q4: Deployment model

For this fully-local tool, what deployment shape should the units take?

A) Embedded/static — one newspaper command + templates, all bundled; single local deliverable (recommended, matches CLI-first file-only posture) B) Split executables that each run independently (no benefit here, but if preferred) C) Library + thin CLI wrapper (the generator logic as a reusable library, plus a thin newspaper script) X) Other (please specify)

Consolidated Summary Confirmation

Summary of your four decomposition answers before the unit artifacts are generated:

Boundary strategy: one unit per component — generator, ai-draft, funnies (Q1=A)

Granularity: coarse — 3 units corresponding to the components (Q2=A)

Integration/contracts: defined internal interface boundaries; the DraftBundle JSON is the review handoff contract (Q3=A)

Deployment: embedded/static — one newspaper command + templates, single local deliverable (Q4=A)

Plan approval: the human pre-approved the decomposition plan (answers recorded via the file, self-guided mode).

Does this all look correct before I generate the unit artifacts?

Looks correct
Request changes

Answer: Looks correct

2.7 KiB Raw Blame History