terminology fix
All checks were successful
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Successful in 24m3s
All checks were successful
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Successful in 24m3s
This commit is contained in:
parent
d55d2665fe
commit
e5d1c0bae9
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Now, I’m not accusing OpenAI of anything here—just pointing out that they’
|
||||
|
||||
* OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools.
|
||||
* They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space.
|
||||
* Now they’re releasing open-source models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd.
|
||||
* Now they’re releasing open weight models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd.
|
||||
|
||||
The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user