From e5d1c0bae9d2899bf2469ae002c3745829a0fa75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: armistace Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:10:37 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] terminology fix --- src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md b/src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md index a6ce27f..3b50e65 100644 --- a/src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md +++ b/src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Now, I’m not accusing OpenAI of anything here—just pointing out that they’ * OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools. * They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space. -* Now they’re releasing open-source models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd. +* Now they’re releasing open weight models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd. The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable?