armistace/blog
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

terminology fix
All checks were successful
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Successful in 24m3s
Details

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
armistace 2025-08-14 13:10:37 +10:00
parent d55d2665fe
commit e5d1c0bae9
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/content/gpt_oss__is_it_eee.md
View File

@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Now, I’m not accusing OpenAI of anything here—just pointing out that they’
* OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools. * OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools.
* They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space. * They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space.
* Now they’re releasing open-source models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd. * Now they’re releasing open weight models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd.
The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable? The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable?