Files
beer_data/.gitea
hermes b73df93f20
Build and Push Image / Unit tests (push) Successful in 1m8s
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Skipped
Build and Push Image / Deploy to the cluster (push) Skipped
feat(ci): add the deploy job so the app deploys from the repo
The workflow built and pushed the image but never deployed it - the
cluster objects had been created by hand. This adds a `deploy` job that
applies the manifests in `kube/` and rolls the deployment.

The deploy job is separate from the build job on purpose. The
`KUBEC_CONFIG_BUILDX` secret is cluster-admin-equivalent, and a build step
that never talks to the cluster should not be able to read it.

Three things this job does that a naive `kubectl apply` does not:

1. `kubectl rollout restart`. The image tag is `:latest`, which is immutable
   in the manifest, so `apply` alone does not roll the pods. Without the
   restart the deployment reports success while the old pods keep serving
   the old image - a deploy that silently changes nothing.

2. Verifies the running digest against the registry's `:latest`. CI green and
   pods `Ready` do not prove the new code is live; the digest comparison does.

3. Smoke tests the running app - `/healthz` and `/readyz` - from inside the
   pod, so a deploy that comes up but cannot serve is caught in CI rather
   than by the next person to open the page.

The Secrets (`beer-db`, `beer-app`) are hand-provisioned and are deliberately
not in the apply set, so a deploy cannot clobber them.
2026-11-09 11:46:06 +10:00
..