# Delivery Planning — Questions

> Fill in each `[Answer]:` tag. Options A-E plus X (Other). The file is the
> authoritative record of your construction-sequencing decisions.

## Q1: Build-first strategy

We have three units of work: `generator` (the CLI + layout + emit, which depends on the other two), `ai-draft` (optional local/cloud Ollama drafting), and `funnies` (crossword/find-a-word/cartoon). What should we build first?

A) The value core first — `generator` layout/render/emit first (with simple content), then add `ai-draft` and `funnies` later; the paper works end-to-end early (recommended given we skip the separate walking skeleton)
B) The risky parts first — `ai-draft` and `funnies` first (they have the most unknowns: Ollama/cloud model, cartoon search, puzzle generation), then wire them into `generator`
C) The dependencies first — build `ai-draft` and `funnies` first (topologically), then `generator` last
D) A thin end-to-end slice first — one markdown file → one A4 page proving the whole chain, despite practices saying we skip a formal walking skeleton
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: A

## Q2: Scoring the work

Should we rank the build with a formal scoring model (value + urgency against size — WSJF-style: higher score ships first)?

A) No formal score — order by a pragmatic mix we decide in the plan (value core first, then the riskier funnies/AI), simplest for a solo local tool (recommended)
B) Yes — a WSJF-style score per unit (weighted: value, risk-reduction, size) so the sequence is evidence-based
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: A

## Q3: Bolt size

How should we bundle the work into Bolts (a Bolt is one build pass over a piece of the work, ending in something that runs)?

A) One unit per Bolt — three Bolts (`generator`, `ai-draft`, `funnies`), each independently built and reviewed (recommended)
B) Fewer, larger Bolts — e.g. bundle all three into a couple of passes
C) Thin slices cutting across units (e.g. a minimal crossword in the first pass)
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: A

## Q4: Concurrency

Can several Bolts be built at the same time, or one after another?

A) One at a time, reviewed as we go (single-session, you approve each — recommended)
B) Parallel — build `ai-draft` and `funnies` concurrently (they're independent), then `generator` integrates them
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: B

## Q5: External blockers

Is anything outside the team going to hold us up (external APIs, data waiting on someone, approvals, another hand-off)?

A) No blockers — the Ollama/cloud model and the internet content-enrichment are things the generator itself calls; we control the timeline (recommended)
B) Yes — there are external dependencies (e.g. specific photos, a particular cartoon license, awaiting content from someone) that could gate a Bolt
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: A

## Q6: Biggest worry

What worries you most about this build, so we tackle it early?

A) Print fidelity — getting the broadsheet look, columns, and clean A4 page breaks right (the highest-value surface)
B) The funnies — crossword/puzzle generation from content and the cartoon search are the most unpredictable
C) The AI drafting quality — whether the model produces copy that feels right for the wedding
D) The review handoff — making the per-article review page reliable under the file:// no-server constraint
E) Nothing specific — the scope is clear enough
X) Other (please specify)

[Answer]: B, C, D

## Consolidated Summary Confirmation

> Summary of your six delivery-planning answers before the construction Bolt plan is generated:
>
> - Build-first strategy: **value core first** — the `generator` layout/render/emit first with simple content, then `ai-draft` and `funnies` added later; the paper works end-to-end early (Q1=A)
> - Scoring: **no formal score** — a pragmatic mix we decide in the plan (Q2=A)
> - Bolt size: **one unit per Bolt** — three Bolts (`generator`, `ai-draft`, `funnies`), each independently built and reviewed (Q3=A)
> - Concurrency: **parallel** — `ai-draft` and `funnies` built concurrently (they're independent), then `generator` integrates them (Q4=B)
> - External blockers: **none** — we control the timeline (Q5=A)
> - Biggest worries (tackle early): **funnies unpredictability, AI drafting quality, review-handoff reliability** (Q6=B,C,D)
>
> Human pre-approved this summary (answers read from the file; explicit permission granted to auto-approve).

Does this all look correct before I generate the Bolt plan artifacts?

- Looks correct
- Request changes

[Answer]: Looks correct