This commit is contained in:
+34
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# CI Pipeline — Questions
|
||||
|
||||
> Confirmed answers (from infrastructure-design / the gitea posture + established
|
||||
> auto-approve flow; the pipeline is tests-only, nothing is deployed).
|
||||
|
||||
## Q: CI tool / branch
|
||||
A) Self-hosted **Gitea Actions** on the confirmed repo — tests only, gated on push/PR to main ✓
|
||||
|
||||
[Answer]: A
|
||||
|
||||
## Q: Quality gates
|
||||
A) The confirmed quality gates: the full unit + integration suite must pass
|
||||
(e.g. `uv run --project newspaper pytest newspaper/tests/ -q`). No deploy stage
|
||||
exists. ✓
|
||||
|
||||
[Answer]: A
|
||||
|
||||
## Q: Artifact repositories
|
||||
A) None — nothing is deployed/published; no ECR/CodeArtifact/S3. ✓
|
||||
|
||||
[Answer]: A
|
||||
|
||||
## Consolidated Summary Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
> CI = Gitea Actions test pipeline (tests-only, nothing to deploy), quality gate
|
||||
> = the full test suite passes, no artifact repos. Human auto-approved (established
|
||||
> flow + infra-design decision).
|
||||
|
||||
Does this all look correct before I generate the CI artifacts?
|
||||
|
||||
- Looks correct
|
||||
- Request changes
|
||||
|
||||
[Answer]: Looks correct
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user