Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
armistace e5d1c0bae9 terminology fix
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Successful in 24m3s
2025-08-14 13:10:37 +10:00
armistace d55d2665fe fix numbering
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Has been cancelled
2025-08-14 13:08:23 +10:00
armistace 465d6d3a46 fix slug
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Successful in 27m20s
2025-08-14 11:57:50 +10:00
armistace 39e60154e7 Merge pull request 'gpt_oss__is_it_eee' (#18) from gpt_oss__is_it_eee into master
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Failing after 8m8s
Reviewed-on: #18
2025-08-14 11:44:54 +10:00
+3 -2
View File
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ Date: 2025-08-12 20:00
Modified: 2025-08-14 20:00 Modified: 2025-08-14 20:00
Category: Politics, Tech, AI Category: Politics, Tech, AI
Tags: politics, tech, Ai Tags: politics, tech, Ai
Slug: social-media-ban-fail Slug: gpt-oss-eee
Authors: Andrew Ridgway Authors: Andrew Ridgway
Summary: GPT OSS is here from Open AI, the first open weight model from them since GPT-2. My question is... why now? Summary: GPT OSS is here from Open AI, the first open weight model from them since GPT-2. My question is... why now?
# Human Introduction # Human Introduction
This has been a tough one for the publishing house to get right. I've had it generate 3 different drafts and this is still the result of quite the edit. Today's blog was written by: This has been a tough one for the publishing house to get right. I've had it generate 3 different drafts and this is still the result of quite the edit. Today's blog was written by:
1. Gemma:27b - Editor 1. Gemma:27b - Editor
2. GPT-OSS - Journalist 2. GPT-OSS - Journalist
3. Qwen3:14b - Journalist 3. Qwen3:14b - Journalist
@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ Now, I’m not accusing OpenAI of anything here—just pointing out that they’
* OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools. * OpenAI has dominated the consumer AI market with their **ChatGPT** and other tools.
* They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space. * They’ve been losing ground in the developer market, where models like [Gemini](https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/) and particularly [Claude (Anthropic)](https://claude.ai/) are gaining traction in the proprietary space.
* Now they’re releasing open-source models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd. * Now they’re releasing open weight models that promise to compete at GPT-4 levels to try and bring in the Deepseek and Qwen crowd.
The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable? The timing feels a bit too convenient. OpenAI is essentially saying: “We get it. You want local, affordable, and flexible AI? We’ve got you covered.” But will this be enough to win back the developer community? Or are they just delaying the inevitable?