'```git
All checks were successful
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Has been skipped
All checks were successful
Build and Push Image / Build and push image (push) Has been skipped
feat: Add reply to AI agenda post ```'
This commit is contained in:
parent
49167ee308
commit
59c7f9cb9e
32
src/content/a_reply_to_accelerating_australias_ai_agenda.md
Normal file
32
src/content/a_reply_to_accelerating_australias_ai_agenda.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||||||
|
```markdown
|
||||||
|
# A reply to Accelerating Australia's AI Agenda
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, Australia must seize opportunities presented by AI to improve productivity. However, we need balance. It is vital that this happens without impeding efforts against unemployment and casualization – though are they bad? Policy settings should ensure:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* **Research & Development**: Government support.
|
||||||
|
* **Data center build (development?).** The idea of leading implies attracting talent back from the US due to hostility towards higher education there, but we don't have those policies.
|
||||||
|
* **Public Sector AI** must be fit for purpose and not worsen poor service delivery – an ambitious goal!
|
||||||
|
* **Skills** are crucial. Not just research skills; application is different too:
|
||||||
|
* **Private sector** needs R&D funding.
|
||||||
|
* **Focus on small enterprises:** big businesses can look after themselves (up to 30% productivity gains in document processing alone!).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Security** paramount, identifying safe data usage. AI Maker hard without correct policy settings for Research & Development and Data Centers. Consider our tax system:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Reduce high taxes on venture capitalists/income earners.
|
||||||
|
2. Increase rates from industries barely paying any (e.g., oil/gas).
|
||||||
|
Small businesses need encouragement through the tax system to move here – reduce overall paid tax. Don't tie AI up in bureaucracy by creating "Chief AI Officers" without right policies and guardrails for private sector direction via incentives, particularly:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* **Administrative assistants:** freeing doctors/nurses.
|
||||||
|
* **Reference Assistants** for Emergency services with updated info on risky questions (e.g., building entry rights).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**AI Skills** development needs attention:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Apprenticeship model** – should we eliminate higher education completely?
|
||||||
|
2. **Scientist vs Engineer analogy** useful. Do credentials matter? Often a shortcut without real skill?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No separate AI Safety Institute unless enforcing ethical dilemmas criminally is viable. Identify key public sector data and release in machine-consumable ways (poppler-utils, pandoc). Reform copyright – fair use needs rethinking across the board. No country perfectly gets this right.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
AI should enhance not hinder or take over our work process!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Cheers to balancing AI opportunities with responsible policies for Australia!
|
||||||
|
```
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user